HOW TO LIVE A CLEAN, PEACEFUL, MUSLIM EXISTENCE...or...HOW I DISPOSED OF THAT COW

Thought I wasn't going to be around until Monday, but ending up doing some research for future essays/articles.

Just wanted to throw out a few "Khomeini-isms" for ya'll to ponder over the weekend.

Keep in mind, that an Islamic nation was ruled by this bastard. Millions lived and died by his words. Literally.

This is the crap that comes out of the mouths of Imams and teachers all over the Islamic world. A lot of it is even worse than this (if you can believe that!!).

The Islamic world's most beloved Ayatollah Khomeini says:

"A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However he
should not penetrate, sodomising the child is OK. If the man penetrates and
damages the child then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her
life. This girl, however does not count as one of his four permanent wives.
The man will not be eligible to marry the girls sister."
From Khomeini's book, "Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom,
Iran, 1990

So, you can sodomize a baby girl as long as you keep her up for the rest of her life(hey, Michael Jackson...sure you don't want to convert?). Nice touch that she doesn't count as one of your wives. At least a pederast can salvage something from the situation.
Sucks about not being able to marry her sister though...

It is better for a girl to marry in such a time when she would begin
menstruation at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any
father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in
heaven."
From Khomeini's book, "Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom,
Iran, 1990 [Mohammad (founder of Islam) ]

So marry 'em before those nasty hormonal mood swings hit guys. Maybe by then, you'll have her completely raped and beaten into submission. And Dads can share in the joy too, knowing that they earned a place in heaven by selling their children into sexual slavery.
Cool!

"A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on.
However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not
sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to
the next door village should be fine."
From Khomeini's book, "Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom,
Iran, 1990

Fucking animals is okay as long as you kill them after you come, and don't sell the meat to anyone in your own village.
Did someone say "party"?

"If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrement become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed and as quickly as possible and burned."

"Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini" ISBN number 0-553-14032-9

So, which is it you morally, ethically, spiritually, and socially retarded scumbags? Can you sell the fucked animal, or do you have to burn it?

And we are called "morally bankrupt" by Islamic nations.
Yeah... I really respect that Islamic sense of honor.

If it weren't so sickening, it would be funny.

BE VERY QUIET... MY LINKS ARE SCREWY...

For some reason, my link to Silent Running isn't working...

You can reach them here.

Goodnight and farewell until Monday.

Quote of the Day:

Today's quote comes from the always relevant, never bland, P.J. O'Rourke.

There is only one basic human right; the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty; the duty to take the consequences.

(1993)

Sounds about right.

I hate to break it to all those hippies and hippie sympies:

You don't have the right to a good job.

You don't have the right to free health care.

You don't have the right to MY money because you're too lazy to work.

You don't have the right to my respect.

The only right we all have, is the right to live our lives as we see fit, and take the punishment meted out when we fuck up.

Simple.

The world don't owe you damn thing.

STEP AWAY FROM THE TOFU! NO, NO... AWAY FROM THE...

Just saw the brainterminal.com footage on Hannity and Colmes.

Tee-hee.

What bean-curd brained morons.

OH, I THOUGH YOU SAID PRIVATES JUT!


Just walked in on Hannity and Colmes to hear Robert Kennedy, Jr. calling SUV owners "un-American".


Sean Hannity asks him if he flies in a private jet...


"I'm not going to dignify that with a response!", says Kennedy.


Touchy, touchy!


I don't always agree with Hannity, but I must say that he certainly laid it on Kennedy. It's nice to see someone who doesn't treat one of the Kennedy's with kid gloves just because he is a Kennedy.


Ha!

THEY ONLY MARCH FOR TYRANTS, STUPID

Picked this up from ABCwatch. Take a few minutes to stop by and view that blogspot.

Just more proof that protesters seem to be a bit turned around. I thought that the lefties were for "freedom" and "social justice".

I'd love to hear the explaination of how Saddam and his evil regime fit into those criteria.

Anyone have any ideas? I think it's gonna be a tight squeeze.

Just wanted to say that there is terrific content out there!

Thanks guys!

I GOT YOUR PROTEST SIGN HANGIN'

This was published in that great bastion of appeasement, The Guardian (I know I was surprised). I'm putting it here, on my blog, just so everyone out there can hear from an Iraqi,

... And why I will not

Dr B Khalaf
Friday February 14, 2003
The Guardian

I write this to protest against all those people who oppose the war against Saddam Hussein, or as they call it, the "war against Iraq". I am an Iraqi doctor, I worked in the Iraqi army for six years during Iraq-Iran war and four months during Gulf war. All my family still live in Iraq. I am an Arab Sunni, not Kurdish or Shia. I am an ordinary Iraqi not involved with the Iraqi opposition outside Iraq.


I am so frustrated by the appalling views of most of the British people, media and politicians. I want to say to all these people who are against the possible war, that if you think by doing so you are serving the interests of Iraqi people or saving them, you are not. You are effectively saving Saddam. You are depriving the Iraqi people of probably their last real chance get rid of him and to get out of this dark era in their history.


My family and almost all Iraqi families will feel hurt and anger when Saddam's media shows on the TV, with great happiness, parts of Saturday's demonstration in London. But where were you when thousands of Iraqi people were killed by Saddam's forces at the end of the Gulf war to crush the uprising? Only now when the war is to reach Saddam has everybody become so concerned about the human life in Iraq.
Where were you while Saddam has been killing thousands of Iraqis since the early 70s? And where are you are now, given that every week he executes people through the "court of revolution", a summary secret court run by the secret security office. Most of its sentences are executions which Saddam himself signs.


I could argue one by one against your reasons for opposing this war. But just ask yourselves why, out of about 500,000 Iraqis in Britain, you will not find even 1,000 of them participating tomorrow? Your anti-war campaign has become mass hysteria and you are no longer able to see things properly.


Locum consultant neurologist, London

I've got a protest sign for you: "Iraqi Blood Upholds My Ideals".

UH... NEVILLE WHO?

Follow this link to little green footballs and a protester with a sign that holds more negative historical connotations than Slick Willy can hold intern meetings.

APPARENTLY, LITERACY ISN'T A REQUIREMENT FOR A SEAT ON THE SECURITY COUNCIL

I was just checking this and thought I would relate some of the salient points and do a little critiquing:

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Saddam Hussein banned nuclear, chemical and biological weapons on Friday, meeting a longtime U.N. demand even as top weapons inspectors told the Security Council they have found no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
The presidential decree, sought by the United Nations for more than a decade, prohibited the production or importation of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons and of all materials used to make them.
[...]

Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri told reporters in Syria that "with this (decree), we have met all that the inspectors demanded." Sabri was en route to an Arab foreign ministers' meeting in Egypt on Sunday.

So, let me get this straight: A presidential decree was passed 10 years after it was sought, by a despotic tyrant to outlaw his favorite weapons and suddenly we should be fawning at his feet for meeting "all that the inspectors demanded."

A little naive, I feel.

It continues:

The U.N. weapons inspection chiefs said that while Iraq has not been completely cooperative they have found no evidence that Iraq has resumed production of weapons of mass destruction. But they said some banned weapons materials have not been accounted for.

"One must not jump to the conclusion that they exist. However, that possibility is also not excluded," chief inspector Hans Blix said.

So Iraq has not been "completely cooperative"? Am I the only person who sees the coorelation between incomplete cooperation and the inability of inspectors to find banned weapons?

For those of you who don't get it, twelve years ago in April, 1991, the "venerable" UN passed resolution 687 that effectively ended the Persian Gulf War.
In this document were laid out demands that Saddam's regime must meet or they would face "serious" consequences.

Here are some interesting points(all emphasis added by author):

7. Invites Iraq to reaffirm unconditionally its obligations under the Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925, and to ratify the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, of 10 April 1972;

8. Decides that shall unconditionally accept the destruction, removal, or rendering harmless, under international supervisionof:

All chemical and biological weapons and all stocks of agents and all related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and manufacturing facilities;

All ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150 kilometres and related major parts, and repair and production facilities;

9. Decides, for the implementation of paragraph 8 above, the following:

Iraq shall submit to the Secretary-General, within fifteen days of the adoption of the present resolution, a declaration of the locations, amounts and types of all items specified in paragraph 8 and agree to urgent, on-site inspection as specified below;

So basically, Iraq was supposed to make a list within 15 days of the adoption of the resolution, hand it over to the UN, and fully and completely comply with international inspectors; this was to include all stocks of agents and all related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and manufacturing facilities.
Didn't I hear inspectors wondering outloud about missing nerve, chemical, and biological agents?
Please notice that this does not say that Iraq can destroy this crap then tell everybody it's gone. They must destroy it under "international supervision". That means someone has to be watching.

The Secretary-General, in consultation with the appropriate Governments and, where appropriate, with the Director-General of the World Health Organization, within forty-five days of the passage of the present resolution, shall develop, and submit to the Council for approval, a plan calling for the completion of the following acts within forty-five days of such approval:


The forming of a Special Commission, which shall carry out immediate on-site inspection of Iraq's biological, chemical and missile capabilities, based on Iraq's declarations and the designation of any additional locations by the Special Commission itself;


The yielding by Iraq of possession to the Special Commission for destruction, removal or rendering harmless, taking into account the requirements of public safety, of all items specified under paragraph 8 (a) above, including items at the additional locations designated by the Special Commission under paragraph 9 (b) (i) above and the destruction by Iraq, under the supervision of the Special Commission, of all its missile capabilities, including launchers, as specified under paragraph 8 (b) above;

Please note the emphasized areas. I think that everyone agrees that the 12,000 pages of "declarations" submitted by Iraq was pretty much crap.

If Iraq's declarations are inaccurate, how are the weapons inspectors supposed to do their job? Are they supposed to play fucking Blue's Clues or Nancy Drew to find this stuff?

No. Iraq is supposed to "yield possession" of said items.

Resolution 1441 says pretty much the same thing. The UN reiterates its 16 other resolutions regarding Iraq.

"Serious consequences" are to be the result if Iraq does not comply.

I am flabbergasted when I hear weapons inspectors that have been run around in circles for years say that Iraq is not in "material breach" of UN resolution 1441.

The demands are laid out very clearly.

What more do they need?

Or should I say how much less do they need? I get the distinct feeling that these inspectors are not on the up-and-up.

Maybe Saddam and his loving son Uday are buying a little more than palaces and snuff films with his bloody oil money.


Just a quick side note: wonder how much UN monkey-licker meat costs per pound? Wanna pitch in and fire up the barbie?

THE BEST PAGE IN THE UNIVERSE

Just visit this page. I dare you....

WELL, NOT QUITE AS UGLY AS SOME OF THE PROTESTERS...

Since so many protesters have no idea what they are protesting for or against, they are easy prey for carnivores like myself. However, it is often necessary to hold your nose, shield your eyes, and hang on to that bottle of anti-bacterial soap as one wades through the masses of the unwashed for a plump piece of meat for the grill. Looking at the photos of the latest protests reminds me of those precautions all the more.


Many of the anti-war slogans are inaccurate and just plain stupid. Yes, war is ugly, but not the ugliest...well, read the quote I picked up from the wonderful folks at right-thinking.com (where you can also view the pictures from the latest protests):

"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
-- John Stuart Mill

You can find these ugly, yet tasty future steaks here



If you head out to that site, you will see what kind of slogans these Einsteins come up with.
Let's just take a couple of these and opine on them, shall we?



No Blood for Oil: Now this might seem like a good one (hey it's worked on other morons before), but there is an inherent fallacy in this slogan. If it were the U.S that had the oil contracts like France, Germany, and Russia, then that might work--in theory--against the U.S. Since we don't, it doesn't. If we wanted Iraq's oil we would've taken it the first time we were there DUMBASS!! Instead, we came home. The only blood being spilled for oil is the blood shed by innocent Iraqis that are murdered by Saddam's corrupt regime.



Israel Is the Problem: Certainly! It's the problem of every Islamic theocracy in the Middle East, and it is definitely the problem of equivocators and apologists for Islam. The only true democratic country in the Middle East (Israel), is beset on all sides by religious fanatics who want nothing but the destruction of Israel and the death of all the Jews. Those signs you social retards are holding up that have Bush and Cheney depicted as Hitler should really be changed: Hitler is alive and well in the hearts of Muslims everywhere. Especially Arafat, whose Palestinian constitution calls for the destruction of Israel and for driving all Jews into the sea. It's certainly a problem for countries like France whose populace doesn't even try to hide its seething anti-semitism. And do I even have to mention Germany?




Just ask these feebs why they are protesting, try to get their arguments. They have none.



Hook up with brainterminal.com to hear the crap straight from the horse's mouth.

(You'll need Quicktime, but the resulting footage is worth the download)



Gotta go. I need another tank of propane. Got me some tree-huggin' hippies to grill up!

IN THE BLOGINNING

Smoke rises from the grill as thick slabs of hippie-meat drip yellow juices onto the coals. The scent of the stringy, vegetarian, protesting, steaks is vaguely familiar... Is it skunk? No, nothing quite that noble. Lemming maybe... The sun peeks from behind fluffy clouds, steam drifts from the crests of snow drifts that are slowly melting. Barbecue in winter. What could be finer?

And so it begins.

Welcome to my blog. This is a place for all those Americans who feel left behind in a country filled with moronic "spokespersons" that pretend to know what is best for us.
You know of whom I speak:

All those Hollywood morons who wouldn't know the truth if it crashed into their Hummer H2. "Journalists" who no longer even try to hide their Socialist agendas, their support for despotic dictators, and their contempt for all that is good and true about America.
I am joining the other bloggers out there who are standing up for the U.S.A.

Feel free to leave your comments or submit essays and links that relate to the spirit of this blog.

Pull up a chair, grab a beer, and have some more hippie steaks.

I have a feeling our meat supply is gonna be plentiful.